History And Philosophy Of Psychology Essay

History and Philosophy of PsychologyAbstractThis canvass answers the following two spark question : Critic entirelyy de considerationine the admit that uniform scheme of system of licit favorableness and kind constructionism argon exchangeable in some burning(prenominal) respects . If they argon equivalent , what atomic number 18 the consequences of this for psycho discursive science s rising as a scientific qualify Conclusions atomic number 18 displace found on query doneHistory and Philosophy of PsychologyCritic entirelyy prove the claim that logical advantageousness and social constructionism are similar in some important respectsLogical logical favourableness descriptionLogical positiveness holds that school of thought should point to the akin kind of HYPERLINK http /encyclopedia .laborlawtalk .com /Rigor wanness as science and that it should post strict criteria for judging sentences discipline , false and centreless (Dictionary .Labourtalk .com 2005Logical logical positivism make lend oneself of exemplary logic , endorsed the verifiability principle as a criterion of meaning and capital importance to the analysis of words of meaning . Philosophers in this succession (1920 - 1936 ) included Schlick , Reichenbach and Carnap . Logical positivism was born from positivism , and preceded logical empiricism post positivism and post modernism loving constructionism definitionSocial constructionism is defined as the view that the phenomena of the social and ethnical world and their meanings are created in human social fundamental interaction . Taken come on , social constructionism can be applied to social look into itself . The approach often , though non exclusively , draws on escapist philosophical orientations (Seale , C 2004 ) The idealist seeks a lull , soothe , kindred universe (Stove , 1991SimilaritiesThe get view is that logical positivism and social constructionism are anti-thetical . heretofore , because they are homogeneous in some important regards , this legitimate view is non an faultless one - the following one-third similarities can be act as in the midst of the two disciplines first off , logical positivism exponents Schlick and Carnap undo what is known and experienced from scientific knowledge . The consequence of extra-mental populace is in their eyes not possible .

withal , social constructionism draws a distinction between what is known and what is experiencedSecondly , logical positivism lengthens the doctrine of conventionalism from the ordinarily accepted principles of geometry to logic , maths and some theoretical propositions . Social constructionism , albeit unwittingly , does the same to all propositions of scienceThirdly , Wittgenstein s `meaning as use thesis is drawn upon in both disciplines - in logical positivism , it is utilize with Schlick s later(prenominal) defense of the verifiability principle and operationism , and in social constructionism it is invoked to confirm claims that all meanings of scientific terms are derived from the context of its usageIf they are similar , what are the consequences of this for psychological science s proximo as a scientific disciplineThe Concise Oxford Dictionary (Fowler and Fowler , 1976 ) gives us the following definition of the term psychology : It is the science of the temperament , functions and phenomena of the human thought or mind and the treatise on , or the system of this . Because it is based on a science psychology is therefore a scientific discipline . By temperament , a scientific discipline develops in stages and is influenced by the beliefs and thoughts of it s exponents at any given...If you neediness to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.