Ethical Dilemma: Client Confesses To A Crime

The communication between the para level-headed employed by R Us and their node Mrs . smith is subject to the constraints of Attorney-Client favour . The claim is for wholly intents and purposes the customer s and protects all communications between the lawyer and his thickening Under no circumstances can an lawyer be compelled to disclose the nature of communications to him from a client . The prefer is more than one hundred years canescent and is meant to foster `full and frank communication between attorneys and their clients and thereby promote broader public interests in the observance of law and the administration activity of justice (Hunt v . Blackburn , HYPERLINK http /caselaw .lp .findlaw .com /cgi-bin /getcase .pl ?court us vol 128 invol 464 pageno 470 (1888 ) at.389Insofar as the privilege is protected the A BA provides an draw oution to the customary retrieve . nab 1 .6 (a ) of the ABA s pretense Rules of skipper contain provide as follows`A lawyer shall not reveal information relating to delegacy of a client unless the client consents after consultation , overleap for manifestations that are impliedly authorized in to carry out the agency performance , and except as stated in paragraphs (b ) and (c (RPC 1 .6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATIONParagraph 1 (b ) of rule 1 .6 of the ABA s mannequin Rules of Professional have a bun in the oven makes render for the attorney to report certain information communicated to him by the client to the befitting authorities . That information is limited to taproom of peculiar(prenominal) crimes , to wit `illegal or fraudulent act that the lawyer reasonably believes is likely to result in death or substantial bodily harm or substantial psychic trauma to the financial interest or property of another (RPC 1 .6 , 1 (b CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATIONThe paralegal s responsibilit! y down the stairs this rule essential be taken together with Guideline 6 of the ABA s Model Guidelines for the use of legitimate Assistant Services .

The general looking of guideline 6 is to preserve the concept of Attorney-Client privilege . The planning of paralegal services is part and parcel of the attorney s workmanlike mission and necessitates the preservation of the privilege through all avenues of legal assistance (Thompson . Feb . 2006 ) Therefore all information obtained by the paralegal via the interview with Mr Robb s client forms a part of the latter(prenominal) s representation of his client Rule 6 of the ABA s Model Rules of Professional Conduct together with Guidel ine 6 of the ABA s Model Guidelines for the Utilization of Legal Assistant Services operates to protect Mrs . Smith s plea from disclosure to the proper authoritiesWhile it is clear that R Us is compel beneath rule 6 via the paralegal to keep Mrs . Smith s confession to the crime for which she seeks representation the privilege does not pass by to her addition that she plans to commit another crime . That admission move under the proviso contained in Rule 1 .6 , 1 (b ) of the ABA s Model Rules of Professional Conduct . Reporting the admission to the proper authorities is...If you want to get a full essay, ramble it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay